{"id":44570,"date":"2026-05-12T15:06:12","date_gmt":"2026-05-12T13:06:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.onecitizendaily.com\/?p=44570"},"modified":"2026-05-12T15:06:12","modified_gmt":"2026-05-12T13:06:12","slug":"south-sudan-should-return-to-dialogue-to-ensure-successful-changes-in-peace-agreement","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.onecitizendaily.com\/index.php\/2026\/05\/12\/south-sudan-should-return-to-dialogue-to-ensure-successful-changes-in-peace-agreement\/","title":{"rendered":"South Sudan should return to dialogue to ensure successful changes in peace agreement"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The persistent tensions between the government and opposition forces are a reminder that the country\u2019s peace needs more efforts<\/p>\n<p>The future stability of South Sudan depends on genuine dialogue and a willingness by all parties to revisit and strengthen the peace agreement.<\/p>\n<p>The Revitalised Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in South Sudan (R-ARCSS) was designed to end years of devastating conflict and lay the foundation for lasting peace.<\/p>\n<p>Yet, nearly eight years after its signing, implementation gaps, mistrust, and repeated delays have weakened public confidence in the process.<\/p>\n<p>Institutions remain incomplete, security arrangements are fragile, and political cooperation between key actors is often marked by suspicion rather than partnership.<\/p>\n<p>This is why renewed dialogue is not optional; it is essential. The political leadership, including the government and opposition groups, must recognise that no military solution will deliver sustainable peace.<\/p>\n<p>Every cycle of violence has only deepened divisions, displaced communities, and delayed national development.<\/p>\n<p>The cost of continued confrontation is simply too high for a country already burdened by economic hardship and humanitarian crises.<\/p>\n<p>At the heart of the problem is the need to review and strengthen aspects of the peace agreement that have proven difficult to implement.<\/p>\n<p>This does not mean abandoning the agreement, but rather adapting it to current realities. Issues such as security sector reform, power-sharing arrangements, and the unification of forces require renewed political consensus and clearer timelines.<\/p>\n<p>Without such adjustments, the agreement risks becoming a static document rather than a living framework for peace.<\/p>\n<p>Equally important is rebuilding trust among political actors. Years of conflict have eroded confidence, and that cannot be restored through legal proceedings or unilateral actions alone.<\/p>\n<p>Inclusive dialogue bringing together all signatories, opposition groups, civil society, and traditional leaders remains the most viable path toward restoring political stability.<\/p>\n<p>South Sudan\u2019s leaders must also resist the temptation to view disagreement as betrayal. In a country as diverse and young as South Sudan, disagreement is inevitable; what matters is how it is managed.<\/p>\n<p>Constructive engagement, not confrontation, must define the next phase of nation-building.<\/p>\n<p>The international community has a role to play, but ultimately the responsibility lies with South Sudanese leaders themselves.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The persistent tensions between the government and opposition forces are a reminder that the country\u2019s peace needs more efforts The future stability of South Sudan depends on genuine dialogue and a willingness by all parties to revisit and strengthen the peace agreement. The Revitalised Agreement on the Resolution of the<a class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/www.onecitizendaily.com\/index.php\/2026\/05\/12\/south-sudan-should-return-to-dialogue-to-ensure-successful-changes-in-peace-agreement\/\">[Read More&#8230;]<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[90,88],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-44570","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-commentary","category-editorial"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.onecitizendaily.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44570","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.onecitizendaily.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.onecitizendaily.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.onecitizendaily.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.onecitizendaily.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=44570"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.onecitizendaily.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44570\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":44571,"href":"https:\/\/www.onecitizendaily.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44570\/revisions\/44571"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.onecitizendaily.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=44570"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.onecitizendaily.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=44570"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.onecitizendaily.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=44570"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}